首页> 外文OA文献 >A brief dementia screener suitable for use by non-specialists in resource poor settings-the cross-cultural derivation and validation of the brief Community Screening Instrument for Dementia
【2h】

A brief dementia screener suitable for use by non-specialists in resource poor settings-the cross-cultural derivation and validation of the brief Community Screening Instrument for Dementia

机译:一种适合非专业人员在资源贫乏地区使用的简短痴呆症筛查者-简短的社区痴呆症筛查工具的跨文化推导和验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Brief screening tools for dementia for use by non-specialists in primary care have yet to be validated in non-western settings where cultural factors and limited education may complicate the task. We aimed to derive a brief version of cognitive and informant scales from the Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D) and to carry out initial assessments of their likely validity. Methods: We applied Mokken analysis to CSI-D cognitive and informant scale data from 15 022 participants in representative population-based surveys in Latin America, India and China, to identify a subset of items from each that conformed optimally to item response theory scaling principles. The validity coefficients of the resulting brief scales (area under ROC curve, optimal cutpoint, sensitivity, specificity and Youden's index) were estimated from data collected in a previous cross-cultural validation of the full CSI-D. Results: Seven cognitive items (Loevinger H coefficient 0.64) and six informant items (Loevinger H coefficient 0.69) were selected with excellent hierarchical scaling properties. For the brief cognitive scale, AUROC varied between 0.88 and 0.97, for the brief informant scale between 0.92 and 1.00, and for the combined algorithm between 0.94 and 1.00. Optimal cutpoints did not vary between regions. Youden's index for the combined algorithm varied between 0.78 and 1.00 by region. Conclusion: A brief version of the full CSI-D appears to share the favourable culture-and education-fair screening properties of the full assessment, despite considerable abbreviation. The feasibility and validity of the brief version still needs to be established in routine primary care. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:目的:在非西方环境中,文化因素和有限的教育可能会使这项工作复杂化,因此,非专业人员在初级保健中使用的简短痴呆筛查工具尚未得到验证。我们旨在从痴呆症社区筛查工具(CSI-D)中获得简短的认知量表和信息量表,并对它们的有效性进行初步评估。方法:我们将Mokken分析应用于来自拉丁美洲,印度和中国的有代表性的基于人口的调查的15022名参与者的CSI-D认知和信息量表数据,以从每个项中识别出与项目反应理论的定标原则最相符的项目子集。 。根据先前对整个CSI-D进行跨文化验证所收集的数据,估算出所产生的简短量表(ROC曲线下的面积,最佳切点,敏感性,特异性和尤登指数)的有效性系数。结果:选择了七个认知项目(Loevinger H系数0.64)和六个知情者项目(Loevinger H系数0.69),这些项目具有良好的分级缩放特性。对于简短的认知量表,AUROC在0.88和0.97之间变化,对于简短的信息量表在0.92和1.00之间,对于组合算法在0.94和1.00之间。最佳切割点在区域之间没有变化。组合算法的Youden指数按地区在0.78和1.00之间变化。结论:尽管有相当大的缩写,但完整CSI-D的简短版本似乎具有完整评估所具有的良好的文化和教育公平筛选特性。简明版本的可行性和有效性仍需在常规初级保健中确定。版权所有(C)2010 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号